United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. David W. Oles Aka David Lane, Defendant-appellant, 60 F.3d 837 (10th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseBefore SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, McKAY and HENRY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT1
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Appellant, David Oles, appeals the district court's denial of his motion to vacate or amend his sentence and the district court judge's refusal to recuse himself from this case. We find no error in the district court's rulings and find this appeal to be utterly frivolous. Accordingly, all requested relief is denied.
AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
