In Re Rudy Benavides, Debtor,rudy Benavides, Appellant, v. David Richard Haberbush, Chapter 7 Trustee; Magnolia Knottcompany; U.S. Trustee, Appellees, 60 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 1995)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 60 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted June 26, 1995. *Decided June 30, 1995

Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Chapter 7 debtor Rudy Benavides appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") affirmance of the bankruptcy court's denial of his motion to reopen his second bankruptcy case. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 158(d), and we affirm for the reasons set forth in the BAP's memorandum disposition filed on July 1, 1993.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.