United States of America, Plaintiff--appellee, v. Oscar Ellis, Jr., Defendant--appellant, 60 F.3d 825 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseOscar Ellis, Jr., appellant pro se. Mary Ann Snow, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ellis, Nos. CR-92-114; CA-94-1142 (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel because the appeal presents no complex issues. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
