Kevin Nathaniel Jackson, Plaintiff--appellant, v. Edward W. Murray; Ellis B. Wright; P.a. Terrangi, Deputywarden; L.p.n. Marshall; Dr. Holland,defendants--appellees, 60 F.3d 822 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseKevin Nathaniel Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA; Jeff Wayne Rosen, ADLER, ROSEN & PETERS, P.C., Virginia Beach, VA, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and orders, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jackson v. Murray, No. CA-93-1073-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, June 10, Sept. 26, and Nov. 17, 1994; Feb. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
