Gregory Alonza Wright, Plaintiff-appellant, v. S. Hunter Howard, Jr.; South Carolina Tax Commission,defendants-appellees, 59 F.3d 169 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseGregory Alonza Wright, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wright v. Howard, No. CA-94-3120-3-17-B (D.S.C. Dec. 9, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
