United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Kenneth Warrix, Defendant-appellant, 59 F.3d 168 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseKenneth Warrix, Appellant Pro Se. Sanford Benjamin Bryant, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, WV, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion and his motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. We have reviewed the district court's opinions and orders, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Warrix, Nos. CR88-191; CA-93-311-3 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 16, 1994, Oct. 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
