United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Kenneth Warrix, Defendant-appellant, 59 F.3d 168 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 59 F.3d 168 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted May 18, 1995. Decided June 26, 1995

Kenneth Warrix, Appellant Pro Se. Sanford Benjamin Bryant, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, WV, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion and his motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. We have reviewed the district court's opinions and orders, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Warrix, Nos. CR88-191; CA-93-311-3 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 16, 1994, Oct. 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED