United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Trevor Grant, A/k/a Roy Arrindell, Defendant-appellant, 59 F.3d 168 (4th Cir. 1995)Annotate this Case
Trevor Grant, appellant pro se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Grant, Nos. CR-92-159; CA-95-46-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel