Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bill Clinton, President; J.b. French, Warden; Sergeantgrimes; L.c. Phillips, Director, Ncdop; Judgefox, Chief; James B. Hunt, Governor,defendants-appellees, 59 F.3d 167 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 59 F.3d 167 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted: May 18, 1995
Decided: June 23, 1995

Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying leave to file a complaint pursuant to a pre-filing injunction and denying Appellant's motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. Clinton, No. CA-94-160-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 1994; Feb. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED