Eugenio Duquesne, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Mike Easley, Attorney General, North Carolina; E. Lynnjohnston; North Carolina Department of Justice,defendants-appellees, 59 F.3d 166 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 59 F.3d 166 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted: May 18, 1995. Decided: June 23, 1995

Eugenio Duquesne, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  Duquesne v. Easley, No. CA-94-1002-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 *

We deny Appellant's request for appointment of counsel