Michael X. Steven Fitz, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Levester Thompson, Doctor; Unknown Specialist, Defendants-appellees, 59 F.3d 166 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 59 F.3d 166 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted: May 18, 1995. Decided: June 23, 1995

Michael X. Steven Fitz, Appellant Pro Se. Carlyle Randolph Wimbish, III, Sands, Anderson, Marks & Miller, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint.*  We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Fitz v. Thompson, No. CA-94-410-R (E.D. Va. Feb. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 *

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636(c) (West 1993)