Clifford Hinds-bey, Petitioner-appellant, v. Ronald F. Moats, Warden; Attorney General of the State Ofmaryland, Respondents-appellees, 59 F.3d 166 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 59 F.3d 166 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted May 18, 1995. Decided June 26, 1995

Clifford Hinds-Bey, appellant pro se.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  Hinds-Bey v. Moats, No. CA-94-3512-S (D. Md. Feb. 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 *

Appellant's allegation of bias on the part of the district court is without merit