Sylvia Miller, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Illinois State Board of Elections, et al., Defendants-appellees, 56 F.3d 67 (7th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseBefore POSNER, Chief Judge, and CUMMINGS and BAUER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
In a nearly unintelligible brief, plaintiff Sylvia Miller challenges the district court order dismissing her civil rights action2 for want of prosecution. We review for abuse of discretion. Halas v. Consumer Services, Inc., 16 F.3d 161, 163 (7th Cir. 1994).
Miller failed to appear at four hearings before the district court. Two of the hearings were for the purpose of verifying the status of Miller's action; a third hearing was held on Miller's emergency motion to expedite her case and for a transfer; and a fourth hearing was held on Miller's motion to certify an earlier court order. Miller makes no effort to explain why she negligently conducted the litigation.3 Instead, in her only reference to the failure to prosecute this suite, she remarks that cases should not be dismissed because of failure to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, if the plaintiffs present valid cases having merit. Quite the contrary is true. Even a worthy civil claim will not absolve litigants from blatant refusal to comply with rules requiring appearances in court. See Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1373 (1995).
We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the suit with prejudice. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
After preliminary examination of the briefs, the court notified the parties that it had tentatively concluded that oral argument would not be helpful to the court in this case. The notice provided that any party might file a "Statement as to Need of Oral Argument." See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f). No such statement having been filed, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record
The action sought to have voting registration requirements adjusted so that plaintiff, a homeless person, could vote in the 1989 mayoral election in Chicago; permit her name to be included on the election ballot for the 1989 mayoral race; and require a special election when the office of State's Attorney of Cook County was vacated in 1989
Recently, we sanctioned Miller for filing frivolous motions in this appeal
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
