Arminta Mohundro Russell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. State of North Carolina; Lacy H. Thornburgh, Attorneygeneral of North Carolina; Robert E. Thomas,district Attorney of North Carolina,defendants-appellees, 56 F.3d 62 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 56 F.3d 62 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted April 20, 1995. Decided May 30, 1995

Arminta Mohundro Russell, appellant pro se. Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, NC, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Russell v. North Carolina, No. CA-94-100 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED