United States of America, Plaintiff--appellee, v. Melvin Lee Sharp, Defendant--appellant, 56 F.3d 62 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseMelvin Lee Sharp, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Arthur Billups, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, WV, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Melvin Lee Sharp appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to correct his pre-sentence report. Sharp waived these claims by his failure to raise them either in his direct appeal or in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) proceeding. See United States v. Emanuel, 869 F.2d 795 (4th Cir. 1989). Therefore, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
