United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Donald Carl Hunt, Defendant-appellant, 54 F.3d 774 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseDonald Carl Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas J. Ashcraft, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, NC, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for a new trial based on newly-discovered evidence pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hunt, No. CR-91-121 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*
AFFIRMED
In light of this disposition, Hunt's motion for appointment of counsel is hereby denied
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
