United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Alfonso Rafeki Brooks, Defendant-appellant, 53 F.3d 340 (9th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 53 F.3d 340 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted April 19, 1995. *Decided April 28, 1995

Before: BROWNING, SNEED and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Alfonso Rafeki Brooks appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following his guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) (1). Brooks' counsel has filed a brief asserting that Williams has no meritorious issues for review and has requested permission to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no meritorious issues for review. The district court did not clearly err in finding that the two kilograms of cocaine possessed by Brooks were not a small amount of drugs and in denying, on that basis, a minimal role reduction under U.S.S.G. Sec. 3B1.2(a). See United States v. Liu, 941 F.2d 844, 849 (9th Cir. 1991).

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.