United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. William D. Longenette, Defendant-appellant, 53 F.3d 329 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 53 F.3d 329 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted: April 25, 1995. Decided May 5, 1995

William D. Longenette, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, WV, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of fine. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Longenette, CR-90-136 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 12, 1994). Appellant's motion to expedite is moot and is dismissed for that reason. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.