Henry Parrish, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Sheriff Harper; Calvin Thigpen, Dr.; David Haines, Dr.,defendants-appellees,andmedical Staff, Defendant, 52 F.3d 321 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 52 F.3d 321 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted: March 14, 1995. Decided: April 19, 1995

Henry Parrish, Appellant Pro Se. Fred R. Kozak, Archer LaFayette Yeatts, III, Maloney, Yeatts & Barr, P.C., Richmond, VA; Malcolm Pollard McConnell, III, Glen Allen, VA, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The case was tried before a magistrate judge.1  Our review of the trial transcript and the magistrate judge's order discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm. Parrish v. Harper, No. CA-93-703-E (E.D. Va. Sept. 16, 1994).2  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 1

The parties consented to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636(c) (West 1993)

 2

We also find that the magistrate judge did not abuse his discretion in denying Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel and a continuance