United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Carlos Garcia-rosell, Defendant-appellant, 51 F.3d 283 (9th Cir. 1995)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 51 F.3d 283 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted March 7, 1995. *Decided March 10, 1995

Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Carlos Garcia-Rosell appeals the district court's denial of his motion for a new trial. Garcia-Rosell claims he has discovered new exculpatory evidence which the government withheld in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court order and opinion, which fully and fairly addreses Garcia-Rosell's arguments.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.