United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. David Charles Mcclinton, Defendant-appellant, 51 F.3d 269 (4th Cir. 1995)Annotate this Case
David Charles McClinton, Appellant Pro Se.
Carl Horn, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, NC, for Appellee.
Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's motion for return of seized property. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McClinton, Nos. CR-89-24; CR-89-98-C; CR-89-99-C; CR-89-100-C; CR-89-101-C; CR-89-102-C; CR-89-103-C; CR-90-17-C-S (W.D.N.C. Oct. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.