Michael Sewell Smith, Petitioner-appellant, v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department Ofcorrections, Respondent-appellee.michael Sewell Smith, Petitioner-appellant, v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department Ofcorrections, Respondent-appellee.michael Sewell Smith, Petitioner-appellant, v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department Ofcorrections, Respondent-appellee, 51 F.3d 268 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseMichael Sewell Smith, appellant pro se. Robert H. Anderson, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Angelone, Nos. CA-91-503-N; CA-91-504-N; CA-91-505-N (E.D. Va. Sept. 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
