James William Thomas, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Edward Murray; E.c. Morris; M.j. Wilkerson; J.a. Smith;ellis Wright; Dr. John Holland; M.a. Tidwell; Jimmywebster; Doctor Henceroth; Harold Underwood; Dr. R.ramsey; M. Warden; Doctor Mason; R. Staples, Captain;c.r. Rowlitte, Defendants-appellees, 51 F.3d 268 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseJames William Thomas, appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA; Jeff Wayne Rosen, ADLER, ROSEN & PETERS, P.C., Virginia Beach, VA; Carlyle Randolph Wimbish, III, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, VA, for appellees.
Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Thomas v. Murray, No. CA-94-244 (E.D. Va. Jan. 11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED..
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
