Ralph Seagle, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Grant Spicer, Defendant-appellee, 51 F.3d 268 (4th Cir. 1995)Annotate this Case
Ralph Seagle, appellant pro se.
Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Seagle v. Spicer, No. CA-94-234 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.