Garland Lee Mitchell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Buckhead Franchising, Incorporated, D/b/a Richmond Host,limited, D/b/a Davis Inn/marketplace, Defendant-appellee.garland Lee Mitchell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; Patricia Glisson,defendants-appellees.garland Lee Mitchell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Mr. Patal, Defendant-appellee.garland Lee Mitchell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Martha P. Wood; Wood's Graphic Art Company, Incorporated,defendants-appellees.garland Lee Mitchell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the Freedom House, Defendant-appellee.garland Lee Mitchell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Richmond Street Team; Nancy Gowan, Defendants-appellees, 51 F.3d 267 (4th Cir. 1995)

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing his six Title VII actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the records and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mitchell v. Buckhead Franchising, Inc., No. CA-94-928; Mitchell v. EEOC, CA-94-929; Mitchell v. Patal, CA-94-930; Mitchell v. Wood, CA-94-931; Mitchell v. Freedom House, CA-94-932; Mitchell v. City of Richmond Street Team, CA-94-933 (E.D. Va. Dec. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.