United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Thomas G. Ruthers, Ii, Defendant-appellant.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Thomas G. Ruthers, Ii, Defendant-appellant, 50 F.3d 8 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseThomas G. Ruthers, II, Appellant Pro Se.
William David Wilmoth, United States Attorney, Wheeling, WV, for Appellee.
Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, alternatively styled as a motion for specific performance of plea agreement (No. 94-7319), and the court's denial of his second 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion (No. 94-7420). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ruthers, Nos. CR-88-62-K, CA-94-4-E-K (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
