Lawrence Tearl, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Ronald F. Moats, Warden, (rci); Sharon Alden, Phs Siteadmin.; Medical Staff, Rci; Prison Health Services,incorporated, in Persons, Individual and Separately in Theirofficial Capacity, Defendants-appellees, 50 F.3d 8 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseLawrence Tearl, Appellant Pro Se.
Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tearl v. Moats, No. CA-94-3222-N (D. Md. Nov. 29, 1994 & Dec. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
