United States of America, Plaintiff--appellee, v. William Frank Norfleet, Defendant--appellant, 50 F.3d 8 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 50 F.3d 8 (4th Cir. 1995)

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995. Decided March 16, 1995


James Orlando Broccoletti, ZOBY & BROCCOLETTI, Norfolk, VA, for appellant. Sara E. Heath, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Norfleet, Nos. CR-90-104; CA-94-277 (E.D. Va. Oct. 5, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED