Santa Fe Pacific Realty Corporation, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America; Richard G. Armor, Defendants-appellees, 50 F.3d 16 (9th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 50 F.3d 16 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted March 17, 1995. *Decided March 21, 1995

IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.

Before: GOODWIN, CANBY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the district court erred in denying all attorneys' fees incurred by Catellus Development (formerly Santa Fe Pacific Realty Corporation) in a CERCLA cleanup pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a) (4) (B). The parties now agree, as do we, that the district court's decision should be affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded for a determination of which, if any, attorneys' fees are recoverable in light of Key Tronic Corp. v. United States, 114 S. Ct. 1960 (1994). We accordingly submit this case on the briefs, and reverse that part of the district court's decision that denied fees for work "that is closely tied to the actual cleanup" within the meaning of Key Tronic, 114 S. Ct. at 1967. We remand so that the district court may determine what part of the requested fees, if any, are recoverable under that standard. In all other respects, the decision of the district court is affirmed. Each party will bear its own costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.


 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.