United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Michael Hirano, Defendant-appellant, 48 F.3d 1217 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseJohn Minh Tran, GREENBERG, BRACKEN & TRAN, Alexandria, VA, for Appellant. John Thomas Martin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, for Appellee.
Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hirano, No. CR-93-29-A (E.D. Va. June 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
