Jesse Antonio Benns, Jr., Petitioner-appellant, v. R.l. Matthews, Warden, Leavenworth Federal Penitentiary;terry Campbell, Sheriff, Leavenworth County Jail, Kansas;detective Castagnetti, Sheriff, Baltimore County Sheriff'sdepartment; Joseph P. Sacchet, Warden, Marylandcorrectional Training Center; Attorney General of the Stateof Maryland, Respondents-appellees, 48 F.3d 1215 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 48 F.3d 1215 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted Feb. 16, 1995. Decided March 6, 1995

Jesse Anthonio Benns, Jr., Appellant pro se.

John Edward Beverungen, Miles & Stockbridge, Towson, MD; Stanley J. Schapiro, County Attorney's Office, Towson, MD; John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Tarra DeShields-Minnis, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on substantially the reasoning of the district court.*  Benns v. Matthews, No. CA-93-313 (D. Md. July 26, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 *

It is not entirely clear from the record whether Appellant has in fact exhausted state remedies. Even if he has exhausted, however, his claim that his extradition was improper is not cognizable in an action bought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Frisbie v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519, 522 (1952); Harris v. South Carolina, 642 F.2d 71, 73 (4th Cir. 1981)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.