United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Justin Call, Defendant-appellant, 45 F.3d 440 (10th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - 45 F.3d 440 (10th Cir. 1995) Jan. 9, 1995

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.


ORDER & JUDGMENT1 

Petitioner Justin Call appeals from a district court order denying him bail pending appeal of his conviction for possession with the intent to distribute over 500 grams of cocaine. He contends on appeal that he is eligible for bail pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1355(c). We review the district court's ruling under a deferential standard, deciding whether petitioner has met the applicable standards set out in 18 U.S.C. 1343, and whether he has demonstrated exceptional circumstances warranting his release. Id. 1343(c). Upon consideration thereof, and after careful consideration of the parties' briefs on appeal, we conclude that the district court's order should be, and therefore is, AFFIRMED.

 1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.