Richard A. Jopson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services,defendant-appellee, 45 F.3d 439 (10th Cir. 1994)

Before BALDOCK and McKAY, Circuit Judges, and VRATIL,^**  District Judge.² 

Plaintiff Richard A. Jopson appeals from the denial of social security disability benefits. We exercise jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 28 U.S.C. 1291, and affirm.

The parties are familiar with the facts. The administrative law judge (ALJ) denied benefits at step five of the five-part sequential evaluation process for determining disability. See Williams v. Bowen, 844 F.2d 748, 750-52 (10th Cir. 1988); 20 C.F.R. 404.1520, 416.920. Plaintiff raises three allegations of error: (1) the ALJ's findings are not supported by substantial evidence; (2) the ALJ improperly disregarded the opinions of plaintiff's treating physicians; and (3) the vocational expert's testimony did not establish that plaintiff is capable of performing substantial gainful activity.

We review the ALJ's decision on the entire record "to determine whether the findings are supported by substantial evidence and whether the Secretary applied correct legal standards." Pacheco v. Sullivan, 931 F.2d 695, 696 (10th Cir. 1991). We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal carefully and find no reversible error.

The judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED.