United States of America, Appellee, v. John Paul Warhol, Appellant, 45 F.3d 434 (8th Cir. 1994)

John Paul Warhol appeals his drug-related conviction and sentence. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the questions presented by Warhol's appeal do not require an extended opinion. We disagree with Warhol's contention that the district court should have granted his motion to suppress because the arresting officers violated the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3109. We also disagree with Warhol's contention that the district court's finding about the number of marijuana plants that Warhol intended to grow for distribution is clearly erroneous. We thus affirm Warhol's conviction and sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.