Patsy Wagner, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Department of Housing and Urbandevelopment, Defendant-appellee, 43 F.3d 1473 (6th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 43 F.3d 1473 (6th Cir. 1994) Dec. 19, 1994

Before: NELSON, NORRIS and DAUGHTREY; Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Plaintiff, Patsy Wagner, appeals from the order of the district court dismissing her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Essentially, the district court concluded that plaintiff could not state a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in dismissing the complaint.

As the reasons why judgment should be entered for defendant have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a full written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning set out by that court in its opinion and order published as Wagner v. United States, 835 F. Supp. 953 (E.D. Ky. 1993).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.