James E. Morgan, Petitioner-appellant, v. Charles D. Marshall, Warden, Respondent-appellee, 42 F.3d 1401 (9th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 42 F.3d 1401 (9th Cir. 1994) Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. *Decided Nov. 22, 1994

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

James E. Morgan, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his habeas corpus petition. Morgan alleges that his sentence violated the due process clause and his attorney's representation violated the sixth amendment. Having reviewed the matter de novo, Sanders v. Ratelle, 21 F.3d 1446, 1451 (9th Cir. 1994), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order, which fully and fairly addressed Morgan's claims.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.