Michael Sindram, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Howard E. Wallin; Richard P. Gilbert; Robert F. Sweeney;thomas A. Lohm; Jeffrey L. Ward; James L. Ryan;cornelius J. Vaughey,defendants-appellees, 4 F.3d 986 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 4 F.3d 986 (4th Cir. 1993)

Submitted: August 20, 1993. Decided: September 7, 1993


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-90-800-S)

Michael Sindram, Appellant Pro Se.

D. Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


Michael Sindram appeals from the district court's order denying Sindram's Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's order discloses that there was no abuse of discretion and this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Sindram v. Wallin, No. CA-90-800-S (D. Md. Mar. 26, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED