Cecilia E. Richardson Rice, Trustee of the Horace D. Andmargaret C. Richardson Life Insurance Trust,plaintiff-appellant, v. New England Mutual Life Insurance Corporation, Amassachusetts Corporation, Defendant-appellee, 37 F.3d 1506 (9th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 37 F.3d 1506 (9th Cir. 1994) Submitted Sept. 14, 1994. *Decided Sept. 21, 1994. As Amended on Denial of RehearingDec. 28, 1994

Before: BROWNING, WRIGHT, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

The law of the case doctrine did not foreclose the district court's consideration of Rice's motion because this court's previous order denying Rice's fee petition neither "explicitly [n]or by necessary implication" held that fees generally are not recoverable in this case. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. E.E.O.C., 691 F.2d 438, 441 (9th Cir. 1982).

WE may affirm the judgment of the district court on any ground supported by the record. Charley's Taxi Radio Dispatch Corp. v. SIDA of Hawaii, Inc., 810 F.2d 869, 874 (9th Cir. 1987). We conclude that Estate of Jordan v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 844 P.2d 403 (Wash 1993), did not represent a change in Washington law; it was merely an application of th rule stated in Olympic S.S. Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co., 811 P.2d 673 (Wash. 1991). Because Rice did not pursue her claim under Olympic in a timely fashion, she waived her claim, and the district court properly denied Rule 60(b) relief.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to 9th Cir.R. 34-4 and Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.