Kenneth Lee Krause, Plaintiff-appellant, v. David E. Watson; Sherman Hatcher; Charles L. Wolff, Jr.;anthony Caito; John Axtel; J. Draney; Jamescannon; C. Kershaw, Defendants-appellees, 35 F.3d 571 (9th Cir. 1994)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 35 F.3d 571 (9th Cir. 1994) Submitted Aug. 23, 1994. *Decided Aug. 30, 1994

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Kenneth Lee Krause, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order granting summary judgment for prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Krause alleged that his due process rights were violated in a prison disciplinary hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We decline to address for the first time on appeal Krause's argument regarding lack of discovery, see Sablan v. Department of Fin., 856 F.2d 1317, 1327 (9th Cir. 1988), and affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's order, which fully and fairly addressed the remaining arguments raised in this appeal.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.