United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Girard Tucker, A/k/a Gerald Turner, Defendant-appellant, 33 F.3d 60 (9th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseBefore: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Girard Tucker appeals his 210-month sentence following our remand. See United States v. Turner, No. 90-50243 (9th Cir. Dec. 13, 1991). Tucker's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he states no meritorious issues for appeal exist. After reviewing the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), we agree. See United States v. Roberts, 5 F.3d 365, 370 (9th Cir. 1993) (government did not have to seek reduced sentence after the defendant breached the plea agreement). The motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the judgment is AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Tucker's pro se motion "to vacate submission without oral argument" is construed as a motion for appointment of counsel and for oral argument. So construed, the motion is denied
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
