United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Salvador Castillo-lara, Defendant-appellant, 32 F.3d 572 (9th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 32 F.3d 572 (9th Cir. 1994) Submitted June 29, 1994. *Decided July 27, 1994

Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Salvador Castillo-Lara appeals his eight-month sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to aiding and abetting the harboring of aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a) (1) (C) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Castillo-Lara contends that he is entitled to a three-level downward departure adjustment in his offense level because he did not commit the offense for profit as defined by the Sentencing Guidelines. We reject this contention and affirm.

Under the Sentencing Guidelines, the base offense level for transporting or harboring an unlawful alien is nine. U.S.S.G. Sec. 2L1.1(a) (2). If the defendant committed the offense "other than for profit," the Guidelines provide for a three-level downward adjustment. U.S.S.G. Sec. 2L1.1(b) (1). The commentary defines "for profit" as "financial gain or commercial advantage." U.S.S.G. Sec. 2L1.1, comment n. 1. This definition specifically excludes "a defendant who commits the offense solely in return for his own entry or transportation." Id.

Castillo-Lara committed the offense in exchange for free room and board at a labor camp owned by others. Other aliens who sought room and board at the labor camp were charged $25.00 per week. Receiving room and board in exchange for harboring an unlawful alien is equivalent to receiving money and thus constitutes profit. Furthermore, Castillo-Lara did not commit the offense solely in return for his own entry or transportation into the country. Thus, he is not entitled to a three-level downward departure.

AFFIRMED.

 *

This case is suitable for submission without oral argument because the legal standards are established and the result is clear. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.