Landon C. Tipton, Claimant-appellant, v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-appellee, 26 F.3d 141 (Fed. Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - 26 F.3d 141 (Fed. Cir. 1994) May 13, 1994

Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and MAYER, Circuit Judge.

ON MOTION

MAYER, Circuit Judge.


ORDER

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(e) and to dismiss Landon C. Tipton's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Tipton has not filed a response.

Tipton seeks review of a decision of the Court of Veterans Appeals summarily affirming the Board of Veterans Appeals' decision that denied his request to reopen his claim of entitlement to service connection for residuals of a cerebral vascular accident because no new and material evidence was submitted. In his informal brief, Tipton argues that the Court of Veterans Appeals misstated certain dates and that the regional office, the Board, and the Court of Veterans Appeals failed to consider all of his evidence.

Under 38 U.S.C. § 7292, this court may review only challenges to the validity or interpretation of a statute or regulation, or to the interpretation of a constitutional provision, that the Court of Veterans Appeals relied on in its decision. If an appeal to this court from the Court of Veterans Appeals does not challenge the validity or interpretation of a statute or regulation, or the interpretation of a constitutional provision, Sec. 7292(d) requires this court to dismiss the appeal. That section states that this court "may not review (A) a challenge to a factual determination, or (B) a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case."

Tipton's appeal seeks review only of factual determinations and the application of the law to the facts of his case. As this court has no jurisdiction to conduct such an inquiry, this appeal must be dismissed. See Livingston v. Derwinski, 959 F.2d 224, 225-26 (Fed. Cir. 1992).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Secretary's motion to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(e) is granted.

(2) The Secretary's motion to dismiss is granted.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.