United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Ernest C. Krikava; Defendant-appellant, [unpublished]carol J. Kriaava; Kevin E. Krikava, Defendants, 21 F.3d 433 (8th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseBefore McMILLIAN, OAKES,* and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Ernest C. Krikava appeals the sentence entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of perjury. Krikava raises several contentions relating to the sufficiency of the indictment and the admissibility of evidence offered by the government. Krikava also raises several arguments about his sentence. After a careful review of the record, we conclude the district court correctly resolved each of appellant's contentions and an opinion by this court would have no precedential value.
Thus, we affirm Krikava's conviction and sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
*The HONORABLE JAMES J. OAKES, Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
