In the Matter of Elenie K. Huszagh, Plaintiff-appellant,, 17 F.3d 394 (9th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 17 F.3d 394 (9th Cir. 1994) Submitted Feb. 7, 1994. *Decided Feb. 17, 1994

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Elenie K. Huszagh appeals pro se the district court's order denying her motion for admission to practice generally in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

Huszagh moved for a waiver of Rule 110-1 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court, District of Oregon. Local Rule 110-1 provides that admission to practice generally in the district court is limited to active members in good standing of the Oregon State Bar. We dismiss this appeal because the district court's order denying Huszagh's motion is not a final, appealable order. See In re Wasserman, 240 F.2d 213 (9th Cir. 1956).

DISMISSED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Accordingly, Huszagh's request for oral argument is denied

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.