United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Thomas Sanders, Defendant-appellant, 141 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 1998)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 141 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 1998) Submitted Feb. 12, 1998**.Decided Feb. 27, 1998

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Garland E. Burrell, District Judge, Presiding.

Before SNEED, KOZINSKI and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM* 

Substantial evidence supported the jury's verdict that Sanders was guilty of perjury. He testified that the boxes were "not recognizable, burnt." A rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that this testimony was false.

The testimony was material to the Grand Jury's investigation. The Grand Jury was properly convened to investigate whether Sanders's brother made a false statement in response to a Grand Jury subpoena. The Grand Jury was authorized to investigate the possible violation of federal law even if its investigation would not result in an indictment. See United States v. Sisack, 527 F.2d 917, 920 (9th Cir. 1976).

The Assistant United States Attorney's questioning of Sanders was sufficiently precise to support the perjury conviction, and the government did not set a "perjury trap" for Sanders by calling him before the Grand Jury and questioning him.

AFFIRMED.

 **

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for disposition without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.