United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Dewey Hughes, Defendant-appellant, 141 F.3d 1181 (9th Cir. 1998)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 141 F.3d 1181 (9th Cir. 1998) .Submitted Mar. 10, 19982. Decided Mar. 19, 1998

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David V. Kenyon, District Judge, Presiding.

Before FLETCHER, BEEZER, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM1 

Dewey Hughes appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for conspiracy to commit federal program fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 666. Hughes's counsel has filed a motion pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), stating that there are no arguable issues for review, and seeking to withdraw as counsel of record. Hughes has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

We have reviewed the record and find that there are no arguable issues for review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is granted and the district court's judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

 2

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 1

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.