Charles E. Mcmanama, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Raymond R. Bagley, Jr.; Wallace R. Carson, Jr.; W. Michaelgillette; George Van Hoomissen; Edward N Fadely;theodore R. Kulongoski; Susan P.graber; Robert D. Durham,defendant-appellee, 141 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 1998)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 141 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 1998) Submitted Mar. 10, 19982. Decided Mar. 19, 1998

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ancer L. Haggerty, District Judge, Presiding.

Before FLETCHER, BEEZER, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM1 

Charles E. McManama appeals pro se from the district court's sua sponte dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint naming an Oregon Circuit Court judge and seven members of the Oregon Supreme Court. McManama alleged that the judges erroneously ruled on his state court actions, were dishonest, and violated the public trust.

We have reviewed the record and affirm for the reasons set forth by the district court in its 8/21/97 order dismissing the action.

AFFIRMED.

 2

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 1

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.