Notice: Eighth Circuit Rule 28a(k) Governs Citation of Unpublished Opinions and Provides That They Are Not Precedent and Generally Should Not Be Cited Unless Relevant to Establishing the Doctrines of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel, the Law of the Case, or if the Opinion Has Persuasive Value on a Material Issue and No Published Opinion Would Serve As Well.kenneth S. Benigni, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 141 F.3d 1167 (8th Cir. 1998)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 141 F.3d 1167 (8th Cir. 1998) Submitted April 7, 1998. Filed April 10, 1998

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Kenneth S. Benigni brought a complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-80. He alleged the United States Postal Service (USPS) failed to investigate a death threat he received in the mail; intentionally withheld his mail from home delivery on numerous occasions, requiring him to retrieve the mail from the post office; and never delivered to him certain weekly newspapers. The district court1  dismissed most of the complaint with prejudice, but dismissed the intentional-withholding-of-mail claim without prejudice. Benigni appeals.

As the district court noted, Benigni's failure-to-investigate claim was barred by the "discretionary function" exception to the FTCA, see 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a), and his loss-of-mail claim was barred by the postal exception to the FTCA, see 28 U.S.C. § 2680(b). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

 1

The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.