Calvin Slade, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Kay Armistead, Deputy Clerk, Defendant-appellee, 14 F.3d 596 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge.
Calvin Slade, appellant pro se.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders that dismissed his complaint under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.A. Sec. 552 (West 1977 & Supp.1993), as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988) and denied his post-judgment motion to amend his complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Slade v. Armistead, No. CA-93-177-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 4 and 17, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
