Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides That Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except when Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel, 134 F.3d 378 (9th Cir. 1997)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 134 F.3d 378 (9th Cir. 1997) Stanley A. LANCASTER, a natural person and sovereigncitizen, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OREGON, being sued as Linda Griffin,Norma # 98064, Cyndi # 580, Gail # 931 and Norma #98061, Defendant-Appellee

No. 97-35543.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted January 12, 1998.^** Decided Jan. 16, 1998.

Before: BROWNING, KLEINFELD, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^*

Stanley A. Lancaster appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action, styled a Petition for Redress of Grievances, alleging that Oregon state officials violated various constitutional and statutory rights in connection with their efforts to collect Oregon state income taxes. We affirm for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation filed April 27, 1994, which were adopted by the district judge in an order filed May 22, 1997. We have considered Lancaster's assignments of error, some of which relate to matters extrinsic to the Findings and Recommendation, and we conclude that they are meritless.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.