James Brechin Folsom, Plaintiff-appellant, v. David Cook, Director Oregon Department of Corrections;frank Hall, Former Director Odoc; al Chandler, Assistantdirector Odoc; S. Frank Thompson, Superintendent Osp;george H. Baldwin, Superintendent Eoci; John Grill,assistant Superintendent Osp; Morrow, Assistantsuperintendent Osp; Carolyn Schnoor, Executive Assistant Tosuperintendent; Chief Medical Officer Osp; D. Anderson,hearings Officer Osp; Sally Peyree, Hearings Officer Osp;carla Tupou, Counselor Osp; Mardy, Registered Nurse Osp;c. Mitchell, Psychological Assoc. Osp; Willie Watkins,inmate Affairs Officer Osp; Trent Axen, Law Librarian Osp;r.m. Harris, Law Librarian Osp; M. Humphreys, Captain Osp;r. Beriault, Lieutenant Osp; H. Myers, Lieutenant Osp; J.herron, Sergeant Osp; Rodriquez, Sergeant Osp; Anders,corporal Osp; Holcom, Corporal Osp; Kramer, Corporal Osp;schavland, Corporal Osp; Birch, Corrections Officer Osp;r. Burch, Corrections Officer Osp; T. Boughton, Correctionsofficer Osp; K. Craig, Corrections Officer Osp; Eskew,corrections Officer Osp; Grider, Corrections Officer Osp;a. Hernandez, Corrections Officer Osp; Kidd, Correctionsofficer Osp; J. Kindel, Corrections Officer Osp; Laney,corrections Officer Osp; Mynak; O'leary, Correctionsofficer Osp; E. Pyle, Corrections Officer Osp; Robertson,corrections Officer Osp; Robinson, Corrections Officer Osp;rodriquez, Corrections Officer Osp; Schmidt, Correctionsofficer Osp; Dave O'dea, Assistant Superintendent Eoci;dallas Northcott, Assistant Superintendent Eoci; Bradheath, Security Manager Eoci; Mark Schachtsick, Programservices Manager Eoci; Wade Scrogham, Hearings Officereoci; Christopher Powell, Investigator Eoci; Sheri Holman,librarian Eoci; Roberto Martinez, Counselor Eoci; M.g.clough, Captain Eoci; Courtain, Captain Eoci; J. Large,captain Eoci; B. Ledford, Captain Eoci; M. Headly,lieutenant Eoci; Marshall, Lieutenant Eoci; D. Riggins,lieutenant; T. Watson, Lieutenant; Harsin, Sergeant;hill, Sergeant; K. Johnson, Mailroom Clerk; Allen,corrections Officer; D. Atkinson, Corrections Officer; D.dinublio, Corrections Officer; M. Eggert, Correctionsofficer; K. Fife, Corrections Officer; Goans, Correctionsofficer; Greene, Corrections Officer; Hackett, Correctionsofficer; Hearns, Corrections Officer; J. Hoffman,corrections Officer; M. Jackson, Corrections Officer; D.johnson, Corrections Officer; Keen, Corrections Officer;r. Mcgraw, Corrections Officer; D. Mills, Correctionsofficer; Morris, Corrections Officer; Noble, Correctionsofficer; Parker, Corrections Officer; R. Pretz,corrections Officer; Scharf, Corrections Officer; K.swilling, Corrections Officer; M. Ward, Correctionsofficer; Wykoff, Corrections Officer; Ronald Myers,hearings Officer; P. Mckeone, Assistant Superintendenteoci; Vawter, Physical Plant Manager; J. Hensley, Actingfood Service Manager; P. Magloire, Education Manager; D.peck, Business Services Coordinator; S. Jackson, Executiveassistant; S. Holman, Library Coordinator; L. Large,counselor; Baxter, Physician; Kugel, Registered Nurse; D.richards, Registered Nurse; J. Robinson, Registered Nurse;p. Anderson, Captain; Bircham, Captain; G. Hascall,captain; Beacham, Lieutenant; Clayton, Sergeant; Charlesh. Cleveland, Sergeant; Gilliland, Sergeant; Hegge,sergeant; Kessler, Sergeant; D. Mitchell, Sergeant;burchett, Co; Fisher, Co; Fowler, Co; Houck, Co; Isley,co; M.l. Jones, Co Kennard, Co; C. King, Co; Lewis, Co;w.l. Richardson, Judge Porter, Co, Defendants-appellees, 134 F.3d 377 (9th Cir. 1998)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 134 F.3d 377 (9th Cir. 1998)

Submitted Jan. 12, 1998**.Decided Jan. 16, 1998

Before BROWNING, KLEINFELD, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.


We affirm the district court's dismissal without prejudice of California state prisoner James Folsom's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, based on his failure to comply with the pleading requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 that his complaint contain a "short and plain statement of the claim." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992).



The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4


This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3